Most supplement recommendation videos are paid promotions in disguise. Our AI checks for undisclosed affiliates, fake clinical proof, and dangerous dosage claims.
Check a Supplement Video FreeSupplement recommendation videos sit at the intersection of health content and commercial incentives in ways that are very difficult for viewers to see clearly. The supplement industry is largely unregulated compared to pharmaceuticals -- manufacturers do not need to prove efficacy before selling, and the burden of proof for safety is much lower. This creates a gap between what creators claim a product does and what clinical evidence actually shows.
The first thing we check is whether the creator discloses affiliate relationships. Supplement brands and direct-to-consumer health companies run affiliate programs that pay commissions when viewers purchase through creator links. When a creator recommends a product and every link in the description earns them a percentage of the sale, they have a financial incentive to be positive that has nothing to do with the product's actual effectiveness. FTC rules require clear disclosure of this relationship, and many creators bury or omit it entirely.
We check the quality of efficacy claims -- specifically whether "clinically proven" or "scientifically supported" language is backed by named studies. Supplement companies fund a significant amount of research into their own products, and that research is frequently designed to produce positive results. A creator who cites company-funded research without acknowledging that fact, or who says "studies show" without naming any study, is building a case for a product on a foundation that cannot be independently verified.
Proprietary blend labeling is the third major area. Many supplements list ingredients as a "proprietary blend" with a total weight but no individual component weights. This makes it impossible to verify whether the ingredients are present in doses that match the research demonstrating efficacy. A product can list an ingredient shown to work at 500mg while containing only 5mg -- and the label makes this completely invisible to ordinary consumers.
The most common conflict of interest in supplement content is the affiliate link that earns the creator a commission on every sale. A creator earning 15% on every purchase has a continuous financial incentive to keep recommending the product positively, regardless of whether it is working for their audience. HypeDetector checks for affiliate link patterns and flags cases where a creator's supplement recommendations consistently point to the same commercial sources without disclosed financial relationships.
The words "clinically proven" have no regulatory protection outside specific pharmaceutical contexts. Any supplement brand can print them on a label. Any creator can say them in a video. HypeDetector checks whether clinical claims are accompanied by verifiable specifics -- the study name, the publishing journal, the institution, the sample size, the methodology -- and flags when the language of clinical proof appears without the substance behind it.
A supplement ingredient that works at 500mg per day does not work at 5mg per day, even if both doses appear on the same ingredient list. Proprietary blend labeling is a legal way to prevent consumers from knowing how much of each ingredient they are actually getting. HypeDetector flags proprietary blend language in supplement recommendation videos as a signal that the product's efficacy claims cannot be verified from the label alone.
3 free checks per session -- no signup needed